frontpage hit counter
DSTAbout UsHot TopicsPodcastsArchives

Categories

Bundling
Cable Show
Cable TV
CES
Commercial Services
Cox Communications
Customer Satisfaction
High Speed Internet
Legislation & Regulation
NCTA
Network Neutrality
Pat Esser
Phone
Satellite TV
Telcos


Podcasts

Listen as Cox Communications President Pat Esser discusses the digital home of 2010 and the impact of “echo boomers” on the communications marketplace.

Drag into your Favorirt Podcast Program

Dishgusting Photo Slideshow
Slideshow

The ugly side of satellite [View Slideshow]

Click here to send us your dishgusting photo



Blog Links

Cable360.net
Om Malik
David Isenberg
Tom Keating
Lost Remote
Gizmodo
paidContent
Engadget



Industry Links

CableLabs
NCTA
FCC
Multichannel News
Take Charge!
This Is Cable
Cable Puts You In Control
CNET
CED
The Cable Channel CableTechTalk



Get Our RSS Feed
Add to NewsGator
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to MyFeedster
Add to Bloglines


ces_2.gif

IPv6: A Looming Crisis?

The secret sauce of the Internet is “IP” (short, of course, for Internet Protocol). IP is the fabric upon which the whole Internet ecosystem is based. Fortunately, as complex as the Internet Protocol is, it’s largely transparent to end users. But as network engineers are aware, the predominate version of the Internet Protocol in use today is version 4, commonly written as IPv4. However, IPv4 can only support 4.2 billion unique addresses, a painfully small number given the explosive growth of the Internet and IP connected devices. IPv6, the version to succeed IPv4, allows for a nearly infinite number of addresses.

It appears that IANA, the International Internet authority that doles out addresses to the regional registrars, will more than likely run out of IPv4 address allocations to the registries somewhere in the late '09 or early '10 timeline. However this does not imply that there won't be any space left to distribute. Most operators that we have spoken with place a realistic 'red zone' date in the 2011 time frame. Of course IPv4 is not going to just miraculously disappear or be mass converted to all v6 addresses within the next decade. We will be dealing with the support of v6-only devices, v4-only devices and dual-stack devices for a very long time. I asked one of Cox’s ace engineers, Jason Weil, to summarize what this will mean for cable operators, and here's what he told me:

- IPv6 will need to be extensively tested in the MSO labs, both in a native deployment, as well as in a dual-stack environment.

- network tool support for IPv6 will be the first major challenge for operators to overcome. This will include fundamentals, such as DNS & DHCP software and hardware platform development and testing. Support for v6 IP provisioning will be a large part of this work due to significant lab validation efforts.

- a protocol translation (6-to-4 and vice versa) service platform will have to be designed or outsourced to allow for intercommunication of IPv6-only to IPv4-only hosts for the decade or longer transition period.

- standards still need to be developed and others fine-tuned in both the IETF and CableLabs realms to deal with problematic areas of operation and integration including security standards, multi-homing, and protocol selection.

- the residential OS situation will also be a major obstacle to overcome. Vista is the first true Windows OS that supports IPv6, and applications that support IPv6 running on Vista are even farther out on the horizon.

- we will need to prepare for the inevitable customer education issues that will arise from this change. Customer support and communication strategies will need to be developed.

The good news is that there is awareness of the issues and work has begun to address them. Some Asian operators, responding to government mandates, have a jump start on this transition, so we certainly can gather lessons learned from our international peers. But this is no longer a topic where we simply grimace and push off the pain to a future date. The planning and work needs to start now, so we can ensure a smooth and transparent transition.

Jay Rolls is Cox's VP of Technology

Posted on August 10, 2007 01:40 PM | Comments (3)

« Sprint Exits Spectrum Venture (But Not Pivot) | Main | The WSJ Looks at Sports Programming Costs, Consumers Speak! »

Comments

What exactly do you mean with "IPv6 a looming crisis"? Not all the points Jason made are valid, I think. IPv6 is widely tested and has passed several tests in major labs. Fully functional translation mechanisms for 6-to-4 and vice versa are available for a couple of years now. Sure, Windows Vista is the first Windows release with IPv6 support but all other major players (BSDs, Linux, Solaris, Mac OS X, even Tru64 UNIX 5.1b) have made their homework years ago. I fully agree with the last point that we will see a lot of demand for education and consulting with regard to IPv6 as a whole, but all the other points are just exaggerated or not completely correct. Feel free to correct me if I am wrong, but I do not see a looming crisis. Me and my colleagues have switched to IPv6 two years ago and will not stop convincing others to follow.

Steve

Posted by: Steve | August 11, 2007 02:16 PM

It's me again,

Well, you apparently did not like my comment. I assume it's because I do not agree with the points made about the "looming IPv6" crisis. Anyway, looks like yet another other corporate censorship. What are you afraid off? Discussion? Negative publicity?

If you like it or not: I am going to write about it on my blog, unless you decide to publish my comment, which I think is reasonable and to the point. I see not reason why it should not be published.

Posted by: Steve | August 15, 2007 01:21 PM

Steve, I apologize for the unintentional delay in responding. I should have been more careful to state in the article that by no means is IPv6 not ready for prime time. However, for many of our vendors, their IPv6 implementations are relatively new and in some cases, not very well tested. More importantly, due to the complexity of our network which includes not only a core IP backbone, but metro and DOCSIS access networks, there is an integration challenge to ensure that all the implementations of IPv6 play well together. Hence this far from trivial to roll out and hence the guarded tone of my article. We do not question the wisdom of going to IPv6, just pointing out how careful we have to manage the transition.

Posted by: Jay Rolls | August 22, 2007 10:31 AM

Post a comment

(All comments are reviewed for relevance and may be posted at our discretion. All or part of a comment and the sender’s name may be cited in future posts. When appropriate, we will reply to comments as quickly as we can. By submitting comments, senders agree that Digital Straight Talk may use the comments for any purpose, without compensation to the sender.)



The opinions expressed by third parties are not necessarily those of Cox, or its affiliates, officers, directors, and employees and Cox may not endorse or otherwise sponsor such views. All information, data, photographs, graphics or other materials supplied by third parties are their sole responsibility. Cox does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of such materials.


footer
Visitor Agreement Privacy Policy Feedback Archives Podcasts Latest News Subscribe About Us