frontpage hit counter
DSTAbout UsHot TopicsPodcastsArchives

Categories

Bundling
Cable Show
Cable TV
CES
Commercial Services
Cox Communications
Customer Satisfaction
High Speed Internet
Legislation & Regulation
NCTA
Network Neutrality
Pat Esser
Phone
Satellite TV
Telcos


Podcasts

Listen as Cox Communications President Pat Esser discusses the digital home of 2010 and the impact of “echo boomers” on the communications marketplace.

Drag into your Favorirt Podcast Program

Dishgusting Photo Slideshow
Slideshow

The ugly side of satellite [View Slideshow]

Click here to send us your dishgusting photo



Blog Links

Cable360.net
Om Malik
David Isenberg
Tom Keating
Lost Remote
Gizmodo
paidContent
Engadget



Industry Links

CableLabs
NCTA
FCC
Multichannel News
Take Charge!
This Is Cable
Cable Puts You In Control
CNET
CED
The Cable Channel CableTechTalk



Get Our RSS Feed
Add to NewsGator
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to MyFeedster
Add to Bloglines


ces_2.gif

Goodbye Fast-Forward? We Think Not

A Convergence Consulting analyst has gotten press recently speculating that cable companies will be forced to eventually disable digital video recorders’ fast-forward capability. Brahm Eiley of Toronto-based Convergence has issued two recent reports predicting such a fate for the FF button, and, ultimately, a bleak future for the DVR. Eiley’s conclusion is that DVR-enabled fast forwarding is killing the advertising model and that, to protect the $71 billion television advertising revenue stream, service providers will have to prevent customers from speeding through commercials.

At Cox, we certainly have no plans to stop customers from fast forwarding through DVR-ed content, a favored feature of these amazing devices. Indeed, we shudder to imagine the likely consumer outcry. With DVRs, it’s unrealistic to think we can or should eliminate such a valued feature as FF now, after paying customers have embraced it and will likely protect it vociferously. It simply wouldn’t be prudent for us to take away this feature, especially when customers could likely get it from our competitors.

But while we disagree with the conclusion, we admit parts of Eiley’s argument are sound.

DVRs have certainly altered the world of advertising. Instead of DVR FF extinction, though, we predict a different outcome. More and more premium content is moving to an On-Demand format. (For instance, popular content like networks’ primetime shows.) In many cases, this premium content will only be offered free to the customer if it contains commercials through which the customer cannot fast forward. As there are some distinct differences between DVRs and On Demand, it’s likely that customers may not resent, or at least will put up with, commercials in certain On Demand content. With DVRs, viewers generally have to plan ahead. You program it ahead of time to record an episode or a season’s worth of episodes. With On Demand, you can be a bit more spontaneous, and it’s reasonable that such spontaneity can exact a price—in this case, the cost of watching commercials. As consumers, we can likely appreciate that if we want to watch yesterday’s new episode of The Office for free via On Demand, we’ll be shown a few 30 second spots.

For advertisers, the DVR reality and rapid technological advancements will necessitate creation of advertising that viewers don’t want to miss, or that is so attention-grabbing it eliminates the desire to fast forward. The realization of such compelling advertising probably requires some level of consumer targeting (e.g., by demographic, aggregate viewing statistics, etc.). Bottom line – if the advertising is compelling, customers will watch it.

Let’s not forget that fast forwarding through ads is not a passive consumer activity, nor is leaving the room to get a soda, etc. during commercials appearing on live TV. The customer shouldn’t have to lose useful functionality, such as DVR FF, simply due to an inability of the media industry to provide relevant, compelling advertising and/or a better way for customers to access desired programming (e.g., via On Demand).

Lisa Pickelsimer is Cox Communications' Director of Video Product Development

Posted on April 9, 2007 03:33 PM | Comments (4)

« Discovery Home Goes Green | Main | Educational Software Study Causes Uproar »

Comments

I think what we'll end up seeing in the next few years is a lot more product placement within programming. I'm already starting to notice conspicuous shots of a brand name/mark during tv shows. This allows advertisers to get their message across without the fear of being skipped over by a DVR. As long as they don't get ridiculous with the quantity of these placement ads, I think it'll be a decent substitute. We shall see!

Posted by: Graham M. | April 13, 2007 10:25 AM

Advertisers should rise to the challenge of making compelling spots. We use a DVR religiously at our house and FF through commercials. However, everytime we see the Mac and PC ads - we stop, rewind and watch them. They are good enough to make us want to watch commercials and other advertisers could do the same.

Posted by: LAK | April 17, 2007 12:19 PM

Hmmm... someone at Cox Communications better update you on today's deal with NBC. Cox has agreed not to allow fast forward on certain shows.

Posted by: Jim K. | May 8, 2007 03:26 PM

Actually, the proposed deal with ABC (not NBC) is for a trial of advanced video on demand opportunities. It doesn't involve DVR content at all. In fact, it's consistent with Lisa's views in this post -- mainly that there are distinct differences between DVRs and VOD and that consumers likely will accept watching some commercials for the spontaneity of watching certain network shows on demand. Again, the deal with ABC has nothing to do with DVR-ed programs.

Posted by: DST | May 9, 2007 06:28 PM

Post a comment

(All comments are reviewed for relevance and may be posted at our discretion. All or part of a comment and the sender’s name may be cited in future posts. When appropriate, we will reply to comments as quickly as we can. By submitting comments, senders agree that Digital Straight Talk may use the comments for any purpose, without compensation to the sender.)



The opinions expressed by third parties are not necessarily those of Cox, or its affiliates, officers, directors, and employees and Cox may not endorse or otherwise sponsor such views. All information, data, photographs, graphics or other materials supplied by third parties are their sole responsibility. Cox does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of such materials.


footer
Visitor Agreement Privacy Policy Feedback Archives Podcasts Latest News Subscribe About Us