frontpage hit counter
DSTAbout UsHot TopicsPodcastsArchives

Categories

Bundling
Cable Show
Cable TV
CES
Commercial Services
Cox Communications
Customer Satisfaction
High Speed Internet
Legislation & Regulation
NCTA
Network Neutrality
Pat Esser
Phone
Satellite TV
Telcos


Podcasts

Listen as Cox Communications President Pat Esser discusses the digital home of 2010 and the impact of “echo boomers” on the communications marketplace.

Drag into your Favorirt Podcast Program

Dishgusting Photo Slideshow
Slideshow

The ugly side of satellite [View Slideshow]

Click here to send us your dishgusting photo



Blog Links

Cable360.net
Om Malik
David Isenberg
Tom Keating
Lost Remote
Gizmodo
paidContent
Engadget



Industry Links

CableLabs
NCTA
FCC
Multichannel News
Take Charge!
This Is Cable
Cable Puts You In Control
CNET
CED
The Cable Channel CableTechTalk



Get Our RSS Feed
Add to NewsGator
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to MyFeedster
Add to Bloglines


ces_2.gif

MLB and DirecTV Deal Announce Their Not-Quite-Exclusive Deal

ico_13.gif DirecTV and Major League Baseball announced a $700 million deal yesterday for carriage of the MLB Extra Innings game package. While it isn’t quite the exclusive deal that had been rumored, it appears MLB will use the arrangement to press cable companies and other providers for a sweeter deal. And if they don’t get it, the PPV package will be exclusive to the satellite company.

MLB said other providers can continue to sell the games, but only if they “agree to carriage rights to the MLB Channel proportionally equivalent to DirecTV’s commitment.” As part of the Extra Innings agreement, DirecTV took a minority ownership stake in the MLB Channel, which will launch in 2009, and agreed to carry the network on its basic tier. Cable companies would have to agree to basic carriage to get Extra Innings. Said MLB and DirecTV in a joint agreement: “Should the incumbents decide not to match DirecTV’s commitment, the MLB Extra Innings package will be exclusive to DirecTV.” MLB said such deals must be finalized by the end of March. At Cox, we continue to negotiate for Extra Innings with our customers’ best interests in mind and are working to reach a fair deal.

Senator John Kerry (D-MA), who had opposed an exlcusive deal, said in a statement, "I will review this deal to ensure that it benefits consumers. I'm encouraged that Major League Baseball may be willing to provide broader access to their games than what was initially proposed. I will be watching clsoely to ensure that the league works in good faith so that America's pastime is available to all fans. My concern all along has been that fans continue to have the ability to enjoy baseball on television."

Posted on March 9, 2007 04:43 PM | Comments (4)

« Improving Education With Technology: E-Rate Turns 10 | Main | Quips from the Cable Communicators Conference »

Comments

I do not want to switch to DirecTV to get the MLB package but I may have to if Cox does not get it.

Posted by: Richard Ryan | March 11, 2007 12:17 AM

I don't get why these large sports organizations continue to trend towards alienating their fans by going for the up front contract money as opposed to attracting a broader base of fans with more availability. More availability = More fans growing up watching = More merchandising. Not to mention more people actually buying the package.

First NFL, and now MLB. I hope the NBA doesnt do this.

Posted by: Paul | March 12, 2007 12:22 PM

You guys (cable, MLB, DirecTV) can point fingers at each other for as long as you want. But if Extra Innings is taken away from me, you all lose my business.

Extra Innings was the only reason I kept Cox instead of switching to FIOS.

Posted by: Extra Innings Subscriber | March 12, 2007 09:35 PM

While I appreciate the position of the previous posts, I don't watch or want to pay for televised sports. If the large sports organizations want to be carried at outrageous prices then they need to let the cable companies put them on a dedicated sports tier. Quite frankly, I don't want to pay for your sports. They are reluctant to do this because the advertising dollars would dry up. As things sit now, they can claim to reach a substantial number of homes and charge accordingly for advertisement. If they were put on a dedicated sports tier, that number would drop substantially. It all seems a bit disingenuous on the part of the sports networks to me.

Posted by: Not a deal | March 15, 2007 11:36 AM

Post a comment

(All comments are reviewed for relevance and may be posted at our discretion. All or part of a comment and the sender’s name may be cited in future posts. When appropriate, we will reply to comments as quickly as we can. By submitting comments, senders agree that Digital Straight Talk may use the comments for any purpose, without compensation to the sender.)



The opinions expressed by third parties are not necessarily those of Cox, or its affiliates, officers, directors, and employees and Cox may not endorse or otherwise sponsor such views. All information, data, photographs, graphics or other materials supplied by third parties are their sole responsibility. Cox does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of such materials.


footer
Visitor Agreement Privacy Policy Feedback Archives Podcasts Latest News Subscribe About Us