frontpage hit counter
DSTAbout UsHot TopicsPodcastsArchives

Categories

Bundling
Cable Show
Cable TV
CES
Commercial Services
Cox Communications
Customer Satisfaction
High Speed Internet
Legislation & Regulation
NCTA
Network Neutrality
Pat Esser
Phone
Satellite TV
Telcos


Podcasts

Listen as Cox Communications President Pat Esser discusses the digital home of 2010 and the impact of “echo boomers” on the communications marketplace.

Drag into your Favorirt Podcast Program

Dishgusting Photo Slideshow
Slideshow

The ugly side of satellite [View Slideshow]

Click here to send us your dishgusting photo



Blog Links

Cable360.net
Om Malik
David Isenberg
Tom Keating
Lost Remote
Gizmodo
paidContent
Engadget



Industry Links

CableLabs
NCTA
FCC
Multichannel News
Take Charge!
This Is Cable
Cable Puts You In Control
CNET
CED
The Cable Channel CableTechTalk



Get Our RSS Feed
Add to NewsGator
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to MyFeedster
Add to Bloglines


ces_2.gif

"Dedicated" Access

posted by CoxEngr
Qwest's latest attempt to improve their market share in the high speed data arena is to try and market their connections as "dedicated". However, as many people know, those copper wires that DSL depends upon only travel a couple of thousand feet until they hit what's called a DSLAM, where that connection becomes a shared connection with everyone else in the neighborhood.

To put this into perspective, it's clear to see that you get a faster connection from cable. If you look at Broadband Report's speed test archive, where they let real customers run speed tests, you can see that out of 128 domestic and international broadband providers, Cox ranks 22nd, where Qwest ranks 68th. In fact, it's interesting to compare the main cable and telco rivals. Top cable companies rank as: Comcast - 12th, Cablevision - 16th, TimeWarner - 24th, and Rogers - 26th. Telephone companies rank as: Verizon - 48th, BellSouth - 65th, and SBC - 72nd. This paints a pretty clear picture of what customers are really experiencing. These results are based on hundreds of tests by individual subscribers of each service.

If you dig into the dedicated versus shared argument about cable and dsl, you can find some sober rational discussions on the topic. To pick a few:

  • PC Magazine: "DSL providers will tell you that each DSL connection is dedicated to a single user, whereas cable connections are shared. In reality, overall performance often has more to do with your location and service provider than the type of broadband connection you have."

  • G4 TV: "Bandwidth is ALWAYS shared at some point."

  • SpeedGuide.net: "A common misconception is that residential DSL is dedicated bandwidth, while Cable modems provide a shared medium."

  • Salon.com: "The argument that cable modem connections are inferior to DSL connections because the bandwidth on a cable link is 'shared' is disingenuous at best. The entire Internet is based upon shared bandwidth. ...the DSL connection ultimately terminates at an Internet router, at which point the multiple streams are merged together into one or more shared upstream connections."

In fact one of the beauties of a cable broadband connection is consistency in speed. With a DSL connection, top speeds are actually gated by where you live and your distance from a telco facility. With cable, the same speeds are enjoyed regardless of your geographic location.

Posted on November 28, 2005 08:29 AM | Comments (1)

« Perks of Living in Dish, Texas? | Main | Coalition Again Secures One-Year ADA Exemption for USF, But Permanent Exemption the Ultimate Goal »

Comments

I couldn't agree more. I have had both DSL and cable modem service, and I much prefer cable's higher bandwidth and higher reliability.

Posted by: Paul McKeon | November 22, 2005 10:38 AM

Post a comment

(All comments are reviewed for relevance and may be posted at our discretion. All or part of a comment and the sender’s name may be cited in future posts. When appropriate, we will reply to comments as quickly as we can. By submitting comments, senders agree that Digital Straight Talk may use the comments for any purpose, without compensation to the sender.)



The opinions expressed by third parties are not necessarily those of Cox, or its affiliates, officers, directors, and employees and Cox may not endorse or otherwise sponsor such views. All information, data, photographs, graphics or other materials supplied by third parties are their sole responsibility. Cox does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of such materials.


footer
Visitor Agreement Privacy Policy Feedback Archives Podcasts Latest News Subscribe About Us